Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 224(2): 219.e1-219.e15, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32798461

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Birth hospital has recently emerged as a potential key contributor to disparities in severe maternal morbidity, but investigations on its contribution to racial and ethnic differences remain limited. OBJECTIVE: We leveraged statewide data from California to examine whether birth hospital explained racial and ethnic differences in severe maternal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: This cohort study used data on all births at ≥20 weeks gestation in California (2007-2012). Severe maternal morbidity during birth hospitalization was measured using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention index of having at least 1 of the 21 diagnoses and procedures (eg, eclampsia, blood transfusion, hysterectomy). Mixed-effects logistic regression models (ie, women nested within hospitals) were used to compare racial and ethnic differences in severe maternal morbidity before and after adjustment for maternal sociodemographic and pregnancy-related factors, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. We also estimated the risk-standardized severe maternal morbidity rates for each hospital (N=245) and the percentage reduction in severe maternal morbidity if each group of racially and ethnically minoritized women gave birth at the same distribution of hospitals as non-Hispanic white women. RESULTS: Of the 3,020,525 women who gave birth, 39,192 (1.3%) had severe maternal morbidity (2.1% Black; 1.3% US-born Hispanic; 1.3% foreign-born Hispanic; 1.3% Asian and Pacific Islander; 1.1% white; 1.6% American Indian and Alaska Native, and Mixed-race referred to as Other). Risk-standardized rates of severe maternal morbidity ranged from 0.3 to 4.0 per 100 births across hospitals. After adjusting for covariates, the odds of severe maternal morbidity were greater among nonwhite women than white women in a given hospital (Black: odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.31); US-born Hispanic: odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.29; foreign-born Hispanic: odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.24; Asian and Pacific Islander: odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.32; Other: odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.50). Among the studied hospital factors, only teaching status was associated with severe maternal morbidity in fully adjusted models. Although 33% of white women delivered in hospitals with the highest tertile of severe maternal morbidity rates compared with 53% of Black women, birth hospital only accounted for 7.8% of the differences in severe maternal morbidity comparing Black and white women and accounted for 16.1% to 24.2% of the differences for all other racial and ethnic groups. CONCLUSION: In California, excess odds of severe maternal morbidity among racially and ethnically minoritized women were not fully explained by birth hospital. Structural causes of racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity may vary by region, which warrants further examination to inform effective policies.


Assuntos
Entorno do Parto/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/etnologia , Complicações na Gravidez/etnologia , Transtornos Puerperais/etnologia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Asiático , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , California/epidemiologia , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/etnologia , Eclampsia/etnologia , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Equidade em Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino , Hospitais Privados/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Indígenas Norte-Americanos , Povos Indígenas , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Obesidade Materna , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Edema Pulmonar/etnologia , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Sepse/etnologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Choque/etnologia , Traqueostomia/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 25(9): 1530-6, 2010 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20796151

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: No studies focus on the population with perforated peptic ulcer in southeastern Taiwan. The present study aimed to assess the differences between the different races and the risk factors related to mortality and morbidity in postoperative patients in southeastern Taiwan. METHODS: The medical records of 237 patients were reviewed retrospectively. The following factors were analyzed: patient profiles, coexisting illnesses, diagnostic method, fever, preoperative shock, clinical data at emergency room, delay operation, site of perforation, operative method, positive ascites culture, species of microbes in ascites culture, postoperative complications, death and the length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Aborigines were significantly different from non-aborigines in the ratio of female cases and in the habits of alcohol drinking and betel nut chewing. There were also four significantly different variables between them: fever, hemoglobin value, site of perforation and operative method. Total postoperative complication rate was 41.3% and 39 patients (16.6%) died. In multivariate analysis, age > or = 65 years, lipase > upper normal limit and preoperative shock were independent predictors of mortality. Significant risk factors associated with morbidity were NSAIDs use, creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL and preoperative shock. CONCLUSION: Aborigines were different from non-aborigines in several categories. In southeastern Taiwan, NSAIDs use, creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL and preoperative shock were independent risk factors of morbidity, and age > or = 65 years, lipase > upper normal limit and preoperative shock were independent risk factors of mortality in postoperative perforated peptic ulcer. Lipase > upper normal limit is needed for further research on the influence on mortality.


Assuntos
Povo Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Úlcera Duodenal/etnologia , Úlcera Duodenal/cirurgia , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/etnologia , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/cirurgia , Úlcera Gástrica/etnologia , Úlcera Gástrica/cirurgia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/etnologia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Areca/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Comorbidade , Creatinina/sangue , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/mortalidade , Úlcera Duodenal/mortalidade , Feminino , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Hemoglobinas/análise , Humanos , Lipase/sangue , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Mastigação/etnologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/mortalidade , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Choque/etnologia , Choque/mortalidade , Úlcera Gástrica/mortalidade , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vagotomia/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...